bclarkie wrote:GraysonAC wrote:Back! Back foul Logic! Your kind isn't welcome here! /could re-buy most, if not all, of my collection for what someone's going to pay for this one moduleSorry for being illogical and for being 100% careful before I drop $2500.00 on something. Maybe I am poorer then the rest of you, but I can not afford to piss away $2500.00, especially when I am not going to be sure that I didnt have to spend $2500.00 at all. Sorry. With that being said Improv does make a couple of good points, but I still fail to see any reason by wanting to be "Anonymous". Is someone afraid that we are all going to gang up them and break into their house and steal it??? Or is because like in other mulitmillion dollar auctions that there can be tax implications, or people not wanting others to know their true worth??? I am sorry, but the other thing I find completly annoying about this whole situation is that this is third ST1 that has come up for bid in the last 8 months and all of it turns into all this bullshit secretive backdoor dealing. Why??? What about this module makes everyone so secretive??? Must be me....
GraysonAC wrote:Back! Back foul Logic! Your kind isn't welcome here! /could re-buy most, if not all, of my collection for what someone's going to pay for this one module
Marlith wrote:Character Archaic...not mentioned by name in the auction but it does mention Wee Warriors so searches may catch it. Just in case someone misses it. Character Record Sheets: Dungeons & Dragons | eBay
bclarkie wrote:Marlith wrote:Character Archaic...not mentioned by name in the auction but it does mention Wee Warriors so searches may catch it. Just in case someone misses it. Character Record Sheets: Dungeons & Dragons | eBay :x Damn you. :wink:
bbarsh wrote:Marlith wrote:Character Archaic...not mentioned by name in the auction but it does mention Wee Warriors so searches may catch it. Just in case someone misses it. Character Record Sheets: Dungeons & Dragons | eBayDamn it to hell. Had the sniper scoped in and ready to go...
Ralf Toth wrote:A few Silver Anniversary Boxed Sets:shrinkwrapped at $112 , 2 days to go: http://cgi.ebay.com/AD-D-Silver-Anniver ... 5243901930
bbarsh wrote:Ralf Toth wrote:A few Silver Anniversary Boxed Sets:shrinkwrapped at $112 , 2 days to go: http://cgi.ebay.com/AD-D-Silver-Anniver ... 5243901930 is right! I was expecting around $75. I am starting to wonder if I should have held onto my extras ... I think we gonna see a much higher value in the next year or so...
MShipley88 wrote:One obvious reason to remain anonymous does occur to me: Maybe the guy does not want his wife to find out what he bid for some paper and cardboard from an English garden society party. :cry:
dbartman wrote:I would also speculate that some collectors are more interested in collecting items than showcasing them for everyone else.
afoolandhis$ wrote:Could be, but my gut feeling is that dbartman was probably closer to the mark:dbartman wrote:I would also speculate that some collectors are more interested in collecting items than showcasing them for everyone else.
jonjhargreaves wrote:And to think I was advised that if I kept hold of ST1 it might go up even beyond the $2500 I got for it. Mine was NM, this is not as rare as was once thought, and yet the bonkers bids keep coming in. If I was to pay big money for a RARE, it would at least have to look, feel and smell like a RARE. This doesn't.Having had an ST1, I'm very much in the I JUST DON'T GET IT camp.
harami2000 wrote:jonjhargreaves wrote:And to think I was advised that if I kept hold of ST1 it might go up even beyond the $2500 I got for it. Mine was NM, this is not as rare as was once thought, and yet the bonkers bids keep coming in. If I was to pay big money for a RARE, it would at least have to look, feel and smell like a RARE. This doesn't.Having had an ST1, I'm very much in the I JUST DON'T GET IT camp.Amen to all that, Jon (including the "smell" bit ).Is not as though prices only go in one direction, though. Even some of the "rares" have decreased in value (and/or should that be "desirability"?), although some people might be reluctant to admit that.p.s. Thanks for your note on the supplements; will recheck against that thread later. No, I haven't completed the list since only a few people bothered to respond or ask what I was trying to do...
harami2000 wrote:[ed.] Giorgio; be careful with those multiple high bids, please...