harami2000 wrote: bclarkie wrote:That is really part of the problem with taking private sales. For one it is difficult enough trying to authenticate the sale, but then you have to consider several other mitigating factors involved in the sale such as how informed are both the bidder and seller and also in especially what happens here alot is one member cuts the other a better deal due to the relationship aspect involved, i.e I sell you my recently acquired 1st print woody(ok ok its in rough shape ) for $600, but if it someone else who I didnt know insisting on say $750. *gives you a probing stare*. You don't need a bigger kiln as well do you, Brian?
bclarkie wrote:That is really part of the problem with taking private sales. For one it is difficult enough trying to authenticate the sale, but then you have to consider several other mitigating factors involved in the sale such as how informed are both the bidder and seller and also in especially what happens here alot is one member cuts the other a better deal due to the relationship aspect involved, i.e I sell you my recently acquired 1st print woody(ok ok its in rough shape ) for $600, but if it someone else who I didnt know insisting on say $750.
harami2000 wrote: Agreed. Many, many factors; and one reason why it's (relatively!) "easy" to go for the eBay realisation-based option!But neither is that the entire "community" by a long shot.Using eBay alone, it certainly seems too easy for lower-value items to slump badly for not-so-good reasons (eBay supply > eBay demand, "not big $" = "not fashionable", less likely to be fought over, etc.).Whereas in a "real life" situation it might be sensible to place a "value" of a few dollars on a mid-50s Dragon and feel like an OK deal with an acquaintance at that price, in eBay terms it's worth mere cents; for whatever reason. (And being unable to dissemble values from large/mixed lots is problematic, too).
harami2000 wrote:Agreed. Many, many factors; and one reason why it's (relatively!) "easy" to go for the eBay realisation-based option!But neither is that the entire "community" by a long shot.Using eBay alone, it certainly seems too easy for lower-value items to slump badly for not-so-good reasons (eBay supply > eBay demand, "not big $" = "not fashionable", less likely to be fought over, etc.).
bclarkie wrote:On a side note, I must say that your post to Mike*mdr003* pointed me in the right direction. Since he is too modest to pimp his own items here, I will do it for him.
louise49h wrote:I now have a reply from the anonymous bidder confirming that no trouble was intended, that he will not take any further part in the auction under any ID other than his usual one and that I am free to withdraw his previous bids. As I said before, I have confirmed his identity. Hopefully this will bring the matter to a close (not, I hasten to add, the auction!).ThanksLouise
bclarkie wrote:<edit> It is now confirmed, I am a complete f*cking moron. With the exception of the above noted appology please disreagard everything that I have said about this auction, as I don't think that I have ever been more wrong in my entire life.
bclarkie wrote: I now better understand the reasons for a legitimate bidder to want to remain annoymous, and so I will also admit that I am wrong about that.
killjoy32 wrote:bri...never mind chummer. i would rather you be vigilant and wrong sometimes, than lax and spot nothing at all.
Deadlord36 wrote:Flan flinger?
improvstone wrote:bclarkie wrote: I now better understand the reasons for a legitimate bidder to want to remain annoymous, and so I will also admit that I am wrong about that. Brian, its cool! Being the small community that it is I can understand someones desire to remain anonymous ... I for one don't feel the need for everyone to know everything I buy or sell. (No it wasn't me) So now that everyone is nice and relaxed lets get back to our regular rare auction bidding / watching. Gotta run guys ... my popcorn is ready
bbarsh wrote:We as acaeum members should be careful - most of us have seen the dark side.