Were original Monster & Treasure assortments unbound?
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
Author


Active Collector

Posts: 78
Joined: Sep 02, 2004
Last Visit: Oct 10, 2019
Location: Los Angeles

Post Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:41 am 
 

Just got a 2nd print off of eBay as part of an auction for an early boxed basic set that had set #1 (lvls 1-3) and found that it was unbound. Is this the way they were distributed, originally? I do not see any signs that they were originally bound, though a cutting board could have seen to that.



Also found out that I am missing a page - the one that would have both sides with 3rd level monsters. I am hoping the seller has it and will ship it to me. Otherwise, would it be possible for someone to send me a scan of the page (both sides)?



Thx for the help.

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3797
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Last Visit: Jul 15, 2021

Post Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:07 pm 
 

I've got a couple of sets, both of them unbound.  If you don't receive the missing sheet, I can send you the scan.  No problemo.

  


Active Collector

Posts: 78
Joined: Sep 02, 2004
Last Visit: Oct 10, 2019
Location: Los Angeles

Post Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:09 am 
 

afoolandhis$ wrote:I've got a couple of sets, both of them unbound. If you don't receive the missing sheet, I can send you the scan. No problemo.




Thank the Lords of Kobol! Looks like I will need that scan, after all.



I don't blame the seller - not only is it apparent that they were originally unbound, but the pages themselves were unnumbered. One would have to look quite closely, and be at least somewhat knowledgeable about D&D rules, to notice that something was missing.

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6720
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Last Visit: Feb 02, 2021

Post Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:06 pm 
 

They were definitely unbound.  Mine were in shrinkwrap only.


"But I have watched the dragons come, fire-eyed, across the world."

  
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 1 of 1