mbassoc2003 wrote:A sticky item at the top of 'classified' would be good.
Keith wrote:I think a wish list is a great idea, and I'd enjoy participating. However, I did not understand the quote above. What do you mean by "sticky item" and "classified".Thanks,Keith
Keith wrote:Thanks for the clarification. I feel like a real idiot, given the fact that every time I access the Forum the "stickies" and "classified" message board are staring me in the face. :oops: It's been years since I've participated in a forum, and it shows.Nevertheless, I still think a wish list message board would be a lot of fun. One of the reasons I like the Acauem so much is that the majority of us appear to be like-minded collectors, but we all have our own particular goals (some collect OD&D, some collect JG, etc). I find that interesting and nostalgic.The other reason I like this forum is that I don't get flamed for asking stupid questions.Thanks,Keith
FoulFoot wrote:The problem with adding a sticky in there is that the Classifieds forum currently doesn't allow replies -- stickies included. I haven't been able to find a mod that will allow replies to the sticky, but not allow replies to regular posts. And at the moment, I don't want to re-allow replies in that forum -- caused too many problems in the past.I think it's a good idea, just can't see how to implement it at the moment.Foul
beyondthebreach wrote:I'd like to see a thread (maybe a sticky) used for help identifying or verifying information. For instance, I am about to post a question about a box set that I only need a quick answer for. Once the first acaeum member posts a reply, that is probably all I will need. I almost hate to start a thread for just one brief question.This could be used for map identification, box sets contents, how many counters does "such a product" have, etc.As long as I'm on the subject . . . the Lands of Intrigue box set contains three booklets. The first two have covers, Book 3 has no cover . . . is this correct? It looks a little odd and I just wanted to make sure someone didn't neatly remove the cover to book 3 . . .Thanks! :D (Now I don't have to start a new thread) . . . .
GraysonAC wrote:Wilfrick, a good site for determining if something is complete is the TSR Archive - This Personal Web Pages (PWP) site has been discontinued. It doesn't have super-detailed info on most things, but it's almost always got a basic description of what comes with a set. Very helpful