guerret wrote:Ah, you are overly sincere about item condition. Not that I don't appreciate honesty, mind me, but that goes a bit to your detriment.
Lewisexi wrote:I've always felt that additional pictures shows that seller is (in my mind at least!) treating the item as "special".
deimos3428 wrote:Lewisexi wrote:I've always felt that additional pictures shows that seller is (in my mind at least!) treating the item as "special".You're right, but a seller has to gauge the insertion fees to the item(s) being sold. If you're selling a lot of common items, you don't want to pay extra fees for additional pictures. If it's something like that Tamoachan up right now, I'd want to see several high-quality scans.
beyondthebreach wrote:deimos3428 wrote:You're right, but a seller has to gauge the insertion fees to the item(s) being sold. If you're selling a lot of common items, you don't want to pay extra fees for additional pictures. If it's something like that Tamoachan up right now, I'd want to see several high-quality scans.Just to be clear . . . you all know that if you write your own html and upload your own photos to a hosting site, you could show any number of photos (any size) for free? Just to be clear . . . (it's not like I'm paying ebay anything for all those big pics I put up!)
deimos3428 wrote:You're right, but a seller has to gauge the insertion fees to the item(s) being sold. If you're selling a lot of common items, you don't want to pay extra fees for additional pictures. If it's something like that Tamoachan up right now, I'd want to see several high-quality scans.