Palace of the Vampire Queen print sequence
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 4 of 1912, 3, 4, 5 ... 171819
Author

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:28 pm 
 

mbassoc2003 wrote:I don't remember the crimp mark at all, and I was pretty careful about scrutinising it when I got it from Burnie.

Could it be somthing in the paper itself that the scanner has picked up on?
Can you see anything with the naked eye?
Does it appear on the yellow cober sheet as well? Or just on the white sheets?


awwwww man do i really need to get it out of the feckin wrapper again  :? i REALLY don't wanna do this :)



  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 6:55 pm 
 

right i have just taken it out of the wrapping one last time - i am definately not doing it again :)

i have looked at every page in the module and i noticed this:

go back to page 3 and look at the scans i did. on the page with the level one map. look at the top. in the middle you will see the mark. look to the left and to the right - midway to the edge on each side. you will see faint marks similar to that one.

i checked every page. some have them marks and some don't. the yellow front page doesn't have any and some of the other pages don't have any either, some have one, some have two but the level one map is the only one where you can see three and if you look VERY closely, you CAN see them with the naked eye. i just never checked before.

i tell you what they DO look like. When the paper sometimes slightly catches on a roller in a printer/copier, you sometimes get that on the paper.

i don't think its a clip of any kind as its not evident on all the pages and i would have thought front and back would have been most evidently marked.

so what do you all think? does anyone else see any of these marks?

Al

ps. of course, IF it was caused by a roller...it might lead to something on how it was printed ?



  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6246
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: UK

Post Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2005 3:10 am 
 

killjoy32 wrote:right i have just taken it out of the wrapping one last time - i am definately not doing it again :)

i have looked at every page in the module and i noticed this:

go back to page 3 and look at the scans i did. on the page with the level one map. look at the top. in the middle you will see the mark. look to the left and to the right - midway to the edge on each side. you will see faint marks similar to that one.

i checked every page. some have them marks and some don't. the yellow front page doesn't have any and some of the other pages don't have any either, some have one, some have two but the level one map is the only one where you can see three and if you look VERY closely, you CAN see them with the naked eye. i just never checked before.

i tell you what they DO look like. When the paper sometimes slightly catches on a roller in a printer/copier, you sometimes get that on the paper.

i don't think its a clip of any kind as its not evident on all the pages and i would have thought front and back would have been most evidently marked.

so what do you all think? does anyone else see any of these marks?

Al

ps. of course, IF it was caused by a roller...it might lead to something on how it was printed ?

Could also be early sheetfeeding or duplexing possibly? Interesting discovery.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . chicken and wild rice soup.

 WWW  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 517
Joined: Oct 03, 2004
Last Visit: Nov 07, 2007
Location: windy south florida

Post Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:35 am 
 

Update. :D

Confirmed... Brad and Morno one in the same. He contacted me with a nice little e-mail. So tomorrow I'll spring a few questions on him. :roll:


"Its either a wand to cast Bigby's Hand spells or a +3 backscratcher. We're not sure which."

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3795
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 15, 2021

Post Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:57 am 
 

invincibleoverlord wrote:Update. :D

Confirmed... Brad and Morno one in the same. He contacted me with a nice little e-mail. So tomorrow I'll spring a few questions on him. :roll:


Great work, IO.  Let us hear what comes of it.   :D

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 517
Joined: Oct 03, 2004
Last Visit: Nov 07, 2007
Location: windy south florida

Post Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:07 am 
 

Update,

Brad and I have been corresponding and he has been a treasure to chat with. :)

Well I've learned some things about what was going on with the Wee Warriors gang. Pete, Judy, and Brad were all D&D friends and lived in Long Beach, Ca, before moving north to Morro Bay, Ca, where Pete was opening a game shop. While in the process of moving from Long Beach…The Character Archaic, the PotVQ Black Folder, and the Dwarven 1st print were all printed in El Segundo, Ca, by Judy's Cousin Jerry Wellfonder at a print shop he owned. According to Brad it was a huge operation with the capable machines, i.e. a foil-stamping press. He remembers being there when they were running them off after hours… Oh the envy. 8)

After moving to Morro Bay Pete used a small local print shop to run off the now established Wee Warriors items i.e. Dwarven 2nd +. Brad also remembers by the time they had all settled in Morro Bay they were no longer being distributed by TSR, hence again the Dwarven 2nd (Produced and Distributed by Wee Warriors).

As far as the Xerox issue and not from Brad's memory, but from simple deduction TSR had to have Xeroxed them. Pete/Wee Warriors wasn't distributing the folder version and he had established his own company/store, and would and did change the distributed by in the Dwarven 2nd and the Palace Acaeum quoted 4th.

If I had to guess I'd say the Dwarven 2nd, Palace 4th, and Misty were printed around the same time, and the Dwarven 3rd and Palace 5th were printed around the same time. Brad remembers the small shop in Morro keeping these printing plates on file. Take a look at the covers, one color covers, then two color covers. Easily this later two-tone technique could be achieved from the same plates.

Oh, and yes, Brad may have some items and art tucked away 8O . I've been completely honest with him about the potential value of these items, and if "that old box of stuff" turns up I'm going to help him in determining values, and bringing an auction to you guys.

BTW Clarkie, and to quote Brad, "I googled my old pen name and finally came up with the forum discussion about the editions of "Palace of the Vampire Queen". For the sake of bclarkie's peace of mind you can let him know that I'd made up the name Morno as an anagram of "Moron", which was something I liked about it :)."… Yes he's been lurking around here since I contacted him. :wink:

Mike


"Its either a wand to cast Bigby's Hand spells or a +3 backscratcher. We're not sure which."

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3795
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 15, 2021

Post Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 11:14 am 
 

invincibleoverlord wrote:Update,

Brad and I have been corresponding and he has been a treasure to chat with. :)

Well I've learned some things about what was going on with the Wee Warriors gang. Pete, Judy, and Brad were all D&D friends and lived in Long Beach, Ca, before moving north to Morro Bay, Ca, where Pete was opening a game shop. While in the process of moving from Long Beach…The Character Archaic, the PotVQ Black Folder, and the Dwarven 1st print were all printed in El Segundo, Ca, by Judy's Cousin Jerry Wellfonder at a print shop he owned. According to Brad it was a huge operation with the capable machines, i.e. a foil-stamping press. He remembers being there when they were running them off after hours… Oh the envy. 8)

After moving to Morro Bay Pete used a small local print shop to run off the now established Wee Warriors items i.e. Dwarven 2nd +. Brad also remembers by the time they had all settled in Morro Bay they were no longer being distributed by TSR, hence again the Dwarven 2nd (Produced and Distributed by Wee Warriors).

As far as the Xerox issue and not from Brad's memory, but from simple deduction TSR had to have Xeroxed them. Pete/Wee Warriors wasn't distributing the folder version and he had established his own company/store, and would and did change the distributed by in the Dwarven 2nd and the Palace Acaeum quoted 4th.

If I had to guess I'd say the Dwarven 2nd, Palace 4th, and Misty were printed around the same time, and the Dwarven 3rd and Palace 5th were printed around the same time. Brad remembers the small shop in Morro keeping these printing plates on file. Take a look at the covers, one color covers, then two color covers. Easily this later two-tone technique could be achieved from the same plates.

Oh, and yes, Brad may have some items and art tucked away 8O . I've been completely honest with him about the potential value of these items, and if "that old box of stuff" turns up I'm going to help him in determining values, and bringing an auction to you guys.

BTW Clarkie, and to quote Brad, "I googled my old pen name and finally came up with the forum discussion about the editions of "Palace of the Vampire Queen". For the sake of bclarkie's peace of mind you can let him know that I'd made up the name Morno as an anagram of "Moron", which was something I liked about it :)."… Yes he's been lurking around here since I contacted him. :wink:

Mike


MOST interesting.  Many thanks for the post, and for the investigative work behind it.  Did you ask Brad why there are apparently many different foldered verions of the PoVQ?  I.e., some with yellow sheets, some without, some with scrollwork on the intro page, some without, etc.

  


Sage Collector

Posts: 2639
Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 11, 2006

Post Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:30 pm 
 

invincibleoverlord wrote:...Pete/Wee Warriors wasn't distributing the folder version and he had established his own company/store...

Heh... Well, part of one of my "guesses" appears to be in some way correct. Will do for me, anyhow, given my recent record... :roll:

Excellent follow-up, Mike. And here's me just thinking you were going to ask him whether he still had the cover art for Dragon #6 and snag anything else in passing. ;)
(Too honest for your own good, sometimes, huh?) :P

Thanks for sharing! :)

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 517
Joined: Oct 03, 2004
Last Visit: Nov 07, 2007
Location: windy south florida

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:48 pm 
 

Wait a minute :idea: :roll: … I just noticed something! Stephen (afoolandhis$), your Acaeum quoted 3rd print Palace looks to have a complete absence of the grid in the interior of the rooms.

Image

As apposed to mbassoc2003 Acaeum quoted 1st print…which has the broken up grid from Xerox type copying.

Image

Then there's the obvious variation of the offset two-tone printed Black-folder.

Image

Hmmmmm :?: :roll: … after further correspondence with Brad on this topic some interesting facts have come to light: :D :!:

1. Brad doesn't remember anything ever done by Wee Warriors that wasn't offset printed.

2. According to Brad, the 1st print PotVQ was - as we noted --an expensive cover. This was only practical, while Jerry Wellfonder was doing the printing, because it was done at cost.

3. Brad also has offset printing knowledge and I had him take a glance at the above photos. He slightly remembers Pete ran off one other less quality printing of the Palace in transition from Long Beach, and the use of Judy's cousin Jerry's print shop…(responsible for the Character Archaic, Black-Folder Palace, and Dwarven 1st), to A1 printing in Morro Bay (responsible for Palace 4th -5th , Dwarven 2nd-3rd , and Misty).

a. After examining Stephen's Acaeum quoted 3rd, Brad believes this was the one, done with paper-printing-plates. Again, not quite the quality of metal, but good enough for a quick run, and would explain the darkness in the cover text and art…as apposed to the blotchy older copier look and complete absence of the grid layer that would be choppy like in mbassoc2003 photo.

b. This would also explain the presence of the "printed" original cover art drawn by Judy, the one used as the original idea for the red-foil stamp.

So, if this is the case . . . the printing order is as follows:

1st. Black-Folder version… (Offset Printed two-tone with grid vs. architectural lines) It was printed in El Segundo, Ca… at Judy's Cousin Jerry Wellfonder's print shop.

2nd. Bagged Yellow-Covered version… (Offset Printed one-tone (Black) architectural lines, no grid inside the rooms) It was printed at an unknown print shop in CA. For obvious reasons i.e. printing costs… this second printing had to be only one color black ink and bagged as apposed the expensive Foil-Stamped Black Folders they were getting for a big discount at Jerry's shop.

3rd Bagged Coverless version (Xeroxed from Black-Folder version, it would have to have been because if it had been copied from the Yellow-Cover version there would be no broken up grid lines like in mbassoc2003's photo).
Brad, said again that he does not remember them ever Xeroxing any Wee Warriors stuff, and if they had they would have Xeroxed the cover art for the Acaeum quoted 3rd as well? They used it for the quoted 3rd.

So, only someone with a Black-Folder version and a copy machine could have made this version. Think about it… the older copiers leave the choppy grid and lines, and obviously you can't copy the cover, copy the folder on an old machine and all you'll get is a black page.

a. So, ether TSR the distributors of the original Black-Folder made these before they received the Yellow-Covered versions, if ever, or somewhere along the way someone bootlegged this version from the Black-Folder.
b. Brad also has printing knowledge and brought up an interesting fact - that copiers of the era "76" were even worse than I thought. They were streaky, they used a slick paper, and they also smelled (this I remember :x :lol: ). It wasn't until ‘80-81 that copying at any descent level came around.

Like I stated, we have a 1976 TSR employee's handbook that was xeroxed in house. I'm going to post a few pic's to see if there's an off chance any of the streaks match. If one of the gang could post pic's of this version that would be 8) .

Mike

Oh… and confirmed, Dwarven 2nd, Palace quoted 4th, and Misty were all printed at the same time... and Dwarven 3rd, and Palace quoted 5th were printed at the same time as well at the A1 print shop in Morro Bay.

That's it I'm fried!... Making discoveries makes my face look like this 8O, but typing a post this long... first my back feels a little :evil: :evil: , then it moves on to more like :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:. It's guess it's all in the name of good clean D&D fun :lol: ...Ouch..I can't move.


"Its either a wand to cast Bigby's Hand spells or a +3 backscratcher. We're not sure which."

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6246
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: UK

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:22 pm 
 

There appears to be a grid behind the hatching? But not in the rooms? Could that be a xerox anomily?


This week I've been mostly eating . . . chicken and wild rice soup.

 WWW  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3795
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 15, 2021

Post Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:59 pm 
 

Incredibly interesting.  Many, MANY thanks for digging into this and passing along Brad's comments.  Wonderful work!  :D

  

User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 2086
Joined: Oct 19, 2002
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: Honolulu, HI

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 9:27 am 
 

I have an Acaeum-quoted 1st print.  Unlike mbassoc's copy, my copy resembles the black-foldered version (other than the absence of the black folder) -- two-tone printing, visible grid.  There's no evidence that the yellow (cover) sheet was ever attached to anything with tape or glue, and of course it's double-sided.

Today, I brought it over to a friend's, to look at it under a microscope.

All of the pages were definitely produced on an offset press (what I expected).  The "two-tone" print (the light gray grid) is actually a halftone, which requires pretty good resolution in the printing plates.  So that reinforces the assumption that the Black Folder print -- and this print -- were printed on a quality press.

Based on this, I'd further revise the print sequence as follows:

    First. With a black folder or in a Ziploc bag.  Offset printed with gray grid on maps.  The "quality" print, printed in El Segundo, CA at Judy's cousin Jerry Wellfonder's print shop.  The Ziploc-bag versions were either copies that came out before the black folder was available, or copies run off after the black folder ran out.

    Second. Bagged Yellow-Covered (with artwork) version. Offset printed, but less resolution -- one-tone (black) architectural lines, no grid inside the rooms. Printed at an unknown print shop in CA. Due to printing costs, this second printing was on a cheaper press, and featured a yellow-paper cover (with artwork) instead of the expensive foil-stamped black folders they were getting for a big discount at Jerry's shop.

    Third. Bagged Yellow-Covered (no artwork) version. Xeroxed from a 1st print by an entity other than Wee Warriors (possibly TSR).  Features black, jagged grid lines on maps, some streak marks. I'm guessing that these prints will be 24 pages, as opposed to 17? (easier to make single-sided copies as opposed to double-sided, which may have resulted in a massive jam inside the photocopiers of the time?
Unfortunately, it will be very difficult -- if not impossible -- to tell if a 3rd print copy was photocopied by TSR in 1976-1977, or by someone else later.  Other than making a forensic note of where exactly those streak marks are on a "genuine" 3rd print, and using that to compare with other questionable copies.

Great work on this, IO.  Further comments and theories welcome.

Foul

  


Prolific Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 754
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 31, 2021

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:42 pm 
 

Howdy All,


FoulFoot wrote:I have an Acaeum-quoted 1st print. Unlike mbassoc's copy, my copy resembles the black-foldered version (other than the absence of the black folder) -- two-tone printing, visible grid. There's no evidence that the yellow (cover) sheet was ever attached to anything with tape or glue, and of course it's double-sided.


I have that same print Scott.


Futures Bright,

Paul


The Collector's Trove The online auction house that features the collections of game designers and artists.

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5626
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Apr 04, 2021
Location: New Hampsha

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:46 pm 
 

Isn't it already established that the black folder was the 1st print and subsequent ones were 2nd+?


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

 WWW  

User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 2086
Joined: Oct 19, 2002
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: Honolulu, HI

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:24 pm 
 

I believe any conclusions as to such were derived from the belief that the Acaeum-quoted 1st print was Xeroxed, and that this must have been done by TSR at a later date.  That's still partially true -- it would appear that TSR, or someone, Xeroxed the 1st print and made the 3rd print.  However, my copy (and stormber's) were not Xeroxed, and except for the absence of a black folder, presence of a ziploc bag, and a double-sided copyright/intro page, are indistinguishable from that print.

Which led me to say above that these offset-printed, ziploc versions either came out immediately before or after the black folder.  If I had to guess, I'd say after -- makes sense that Wee Warriors ran out of the (expensive) black folder, but decided to run off a few more copies while they still had easy access to the plates and the press.  But so far, there hasn't been any empirical evidence (or statements from Morno) to say which really came first.

Unless further recollections from Morno, or some other evidence that we're missing should surface, I'm inclined to call both "versions of the First print".  Those with black folders will tend to fetch a higher price.

Foul

  


Prolific Collector

Posts: 517
Joined: Oct 03, 2004
Last Visit: Nov 07, 2007
Location: windy south florida

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 3:45 pm 
 

You know…I thought about something. We're basing this entire "Xeroxed-print-run" off only mbassoc2003's photo. Could it be that he has a bootleg? Someone along the way just copied it? Anyone else have one of these Xeroxed versions? Everyone else… folder or not has the two-tone version so far except Stephen's Yellow-Cover that's qualifying as a lower grade second print, but needs further research.

These copied versions could be just that. Where did you get you're copy mbassoc? Could be these were just made by gamer's of the era, i.e. "Hay I need a copy"…and passed around between industry alum in this way??


"Its either a wand to cast Bigby's Hand spells or a +3 backscratcher. We're not sure which."

  

User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 2086
Joined: Oct 19, 2002
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: Honolulu, HI

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:44 pm 
 

I'd be interested to hear from anyone who has a 24-page version (regardless of print or cover).  Those are my bet for "xeroxed" -- and I believe there's quite a few of them.

Foul

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 6:10 pm 
 

hi guys. i have mbassoc's PotVQ now. i scanned a page of the first level map some time back on this thread.

now. looking at foul's suggested print's etc, that sounds like a fair judgment on the research that has been made. however.....

mine is one of them with the yellow front sheet , but it does have "some" artwork, ie the borders of the page and the fancy "palace of the vampire queen" at the bottom of the page, the same as the maps show. BUT....there is no smudging or streaks on any of the pages. the maps (i scanned the page of the level one map earlier) all have nice clear grey-scale grids on the whole map and every map in the module (i checked them all).

the map pages are single-sided, but the text pages of the module are all double-sided.

this sounds more like the 2nd without the artwork front, and much better than the third. this was why i wanted to win that one on ebay not so long ago with the yellow front sheet with the artwork so i could compare with this one....

any ideas?



  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6246
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Last Visit: Apr 21, 2021
Location: UK

Post Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 4:09 am 
 

killjoy32 wrote:hi guys. i have mbassoc's PotVQ now. i scanned a page of the first level map some time back on this thread.

now. looking at foul's suggested print's etc, that sounds like a fair judgment on the research that has been made. however.....

mine is one of them with the yellow front sheet , but it does have "some" artwork, ie the borders of the page and the fancy "palace of the vampire queen" at the bottom of the page, the same as the maps show. BUT....there is no smudging or streaks on any of the pages. the maps (i scanned the page of the level one map earlier) all have nice clear grey-scale grids on the whole map and every map in the module (i checked them all).

the map pages are single-sided, but the text pages of the module are all double-sided.

this sounds more like the 2nd without the artwork front, and much better than the third. this was why i wanted to win that one on ebay not so long ago with the yellow front sheet with the artwork so i could compare with this one....

any ideas?

Hi Alan,

From what is written above, your copy is listed as a 'first print without folder'. The artwork refered to by foul is the yellow drawing of the castle. He's moved 3rd print to 2nd print, and combined 2nd and 1st to 1st with and 1st without black folder.

As regards the scan I posted, I imagine it is an artifact of the scanner that scattered the grey lines. Unfortunately, once I was asked to go back and check I had already posted Alan's PoVQ to him.

The copy in question is the Mint 1st copy bought by Devon in Feb 03 for $562 and bought by me Feb 05 for $789.


This week I've been mostly eating . . . chicken and wild rice soup.

 WWW  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8219
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Jun 12, 2017
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 4:23 am 
 

thanks ian...feel somewhat more relieved now :)



  
PreviousNext
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 4 of 1912, 3, 4, 5 ... 171819