mbassoc2003 wrote:I don't remember the crimp mark at all, and I was pretty careful about scrutinising it when I got it from Burnie.

Could it be somthing in the paper itself that the scanner has picked up on?
Can you see anything with the naked eye?
Does it appear on the yellow cober sheet as well? Or just on the white sheets?

awwwww man do i really need to get it out of the feckin wrapper again  :? i REALLY don't wanna do this

killjoy32 wrote:right i have just taken it out of the wrapping one last time - i am definately not doing it again

i have looked at every page in the module and i noticed this:

go back to page 3 and look at the scans i did. on the page with the level one map. look at the top. in the middle you will see the mark. look to the left and to the right - midway to the edge on each side. you will see faint marks similar to that one.

i checked every page. some have them marks and some don't. the yellow front page doesn't have any and some of the other pages don't have any either, some have one, some have two but the level one map is the only one where you can see three and if you look VERY closely, you CAN see them with the naked eye. i just never checked before.

i tell you what they DO look like. When the paper sometimes slightly catches on a roller in a printer/copier, you sometimes get that on the paper.

i don't think its a clip of any kind as its not evident on all the pages and i would have thought front and back would have been most evidently marked.

so what do you all think? does anyone else see any of these marks?

Al

ps. of course, IF it was caused by a roller...it might lead to something on how it was printed ?

Could also be early sheetfeeding or duplexing possibly? Interesting discovery.

invincibleoverlord wrote:Update.

Confirmed... Brad and Morno one in the same. He contacted me with a nice little e-mail. So tomorrow I'll spring a few questions on him.

Great work, IO.  Let us hear what comes of it.  

invincibleoverlord wrote:Update,

Brad and I have been corresponding and he has been a treasure to chat with.

Well I've learned some things about what was going on with the Wee Warriors gang. Pete, Judy, and Brad were all D&D friends and lived in Long Beach, Ca, before moving north to Morro Bay, Ca, where Pete was opening a game shop. While in the process of moving from Long Beach…The Character Archaic, the PotVQ Black Folder, and the Dwarven 1st print were all printed in El Segundo, Ca, by Judy's Cousin Jerry Wellfonder at a print shop he owned. According to Brad it was a huge operation with the capable machines, i.e. a foil-stamping press. He remembers being there when they were running them off after hours… Oh the envy.

After moving to Morro Bay Pete used a small local print shop to run off the now established Wee Warriors items i.e. Dwarven 2nd +. Brad also remembers by the time they had all settled in Morro Bay they were no longer being distributed by TSR, hence again the Dwarven 2nd (Produced and Distributed by Wee Warriors).

As far as the Xerox issue and not from Brad's memory, but from simple deduction TSR had to have Xeroxed them. Pete/Wee Warriors wasn't distributing the folder version and he had established his own company/store, and would and did change the distributed by in the Dwarven 2nd and the Palace Acaeum quoted 4th.

If I had to guess I'd say the Dwarven 2nd, Palace 4th, and Misty were printed around the same time, and the Dwarven 3rd and Palace 5th were printed around the same time. Brad remembers the small shop in Morro keeping these printing plates on file. Take a look at the covers, one color covers, then two color covers. Easily this later two-tone technique could be achieved from the same plates.

Oh, and yes, Brad may have some items and art tucked away . I've been completely honest with him about the potential value of these items, and if "that old box of stuff" turns up I'm going to help him in determining values, and bringing an auction to you guys.

BTW Clarkie, and to quote Brad, "I googled my old pen name and finally came up with the forum discussion about the editions of "Palace of the Vampire Queen". For the sake of bclarkie's peace of mind you can let him know that I'd made up the name Morno as an anagram of "Moron", which was something I liked about it ."… Yes he's been lurking around here since I contacted him.

Mike

MOST interesting.  Many thanks for the post, and for the investigative work behind it.  Did you ask Brad why there are apparently many different foldered verions of the PoVQ?  I.e., some with yellow sheets, some without, some with scrollwork on the intro page, some without, etc.

Wait a minute … I just noticed something! Stephen (afoolandhis$), your Acaeum quoted 3rd print Palace looks to have a complete absence of the grid in the interior of the rooms.



As apposed to mbassoc2003 Acaeum quoted 1st print…which has the broken up grid from Xerox type copying.



Then there's the obvious variation of the offset two-tone printed Black-folder.



Hmmmmm … after further correspondence with Brad on this topic some interesting facts have come to light:

1. Brad doesn't remember anything ever done by Wee Warriors that wasn't offset printed.

2. According to Brad, the 1st print PotVQ was - as we noted --an expensive cover. This was only practical, while Jerry Wellfonder was doing the printing, because it was done at cost.

3. Brad also has offset printing knowledge and I had him take a glance at the above photos. He slightly remembers Pete ran off one other less quality printing of the Palace in transition from Long Beach, and the use of Judy's cousin Jerry's print shop…(responsible for the Character Archaic, Black-Folder Palace, and Dwarven 1st), to A1 printing in Morro Bay (responsible for Palace 4th -5th , Dwarven 2nd-3rd , and Misty).

a. After examining Stephen's Acaeum quoted 3rd, Brad believes this was the one, done with paper-printing-plates. Again, not quite the quality of metal, but good enough for a quick run, and would explain the darkness in the cover text and art…as apposed to the blotchy older copier look and complete absence of the grid layer that would be choppy like in mbassoc2003 photo.

b. This would also explain the presence of the "printed" original cover art drawn by Judy, the one used as the original idea for the red-foil stamp.

So, if this is the case . . . the printing order is as follows:

1st. Black-Folder version… (Offset Printed two-tone with grid vs. architectural lines) It was printed in El Segundo, Ca… at Judy's Cousin Jerry Wellfonder's print shop.

2nd. Bagged Yellow-Covered version… (Offset Printed one-tone (Black) architectural lines, no grid inside the rooms) It was printed at an unknown print shop in CA. For obvious reasons i.e. printing costs… this second printing had to be only one color black ink and bagged as apposed the expensive Foil-Stamped Black Folders they were getting for a big discount at Jerry's shop.

3rd Bagged Coverless version (Xeroxed from Black-Folder version, it would have to have been because if it had been copied from the Yellow-Cover version there would be no broken up grid lines like in mbassoc2003's photo).
Brad, said again that he does not remember them ever Xeroxing any Wee Warriors stuff, and if they had they would have Xeroxed the cover art for the Acaeum quoted 3rd as well? They used it for the quoted 3rd.

So, only someone with a Black-Folder version and a copy machine could have made this version. Think about it… the older copiers leave the choppy grid and lines, and obviously you can't copy the cover, copy the folder on an old machine and all you'll get is a black page.

a. So, ether TSR the distributors of the original Black-Folder made these before they received the Yellow-Covered versions, if ever, or somewhere along the way someone bootlegged this version from the Black-Folder.
b. Brad also has printing knowledge and brought up an interesting fact - that copiers of the era "76" were even worse than I thought. They were streaky, they used a slick paper, and they also smelled (this I remember ). It wasn't until ‘80-81 that copying at any descent level came around.

Like I stated, we have a 1976 TSR employee's handbook that was xeroxed in house. I'm going to post a few pic's to see if there's an off chance any of the streaks match. If one of the gang could post pic's of this version that would be .

Mike

Oh… and confirmed, Dwarven 2nd, Palace quoted 4th, and Misty were all printed at the same time... and Dwarven 3rd, and Palace quoted 5th were printed at the same time as well at the A1 print shop in Morro Bay.

That's it I'm fried!... Making discoveries makes my face look like this , but typing a post this long... first my back feels a little , then it moves on to more like . It's guess it's all in the name of good clean D&D fun ...Ouch..I can't move.

Incredibly interesting.  Many, MANY thanks for digging into this and passing along Brad's comments.  Wonderful work!  :D

Howdy All,

FoulFoot wrote:I have an Acaeum-quoted 1st print. Unlike mbassoc's copy, my copy resembles the black-foldered version (other than the absence of the black folder) -- two-tone printing, visible grid. There's no evidence that the yellow (cover) sheet was ever attached to anything with tape or glue, and of course it's double-sided.

I have that same print Scott.


Futures Bright,

Paul

I believe any conclusions as to such were derived from the belief that the Acaeum-quoted 1st print was Xeroxed, and that this must have been done by TSR at a later date.  That's still partially true -- it would appear that TSR, or someone, Xeroxed the 1st print and made the 3rd print.  However, my copy (and stormber's) were not Xeroxed, and except for the absence of a black folder, presence of a ziploc bag, and a double-sided copyright/intro page, are indistinguishable from that print.

Which led me to say above that these offset-printed, ziploc versions either came out immediately before or after the black folder.  If I had to guess, I'd say after -- makes sense that Wee Warriors ran out of the (expensive) black folder, but decided to run off a few more copies while they still had easy access to the plates and the press.  But so far, there hasn't been any empirical evidence (or statements from Morno) to say which really came first.

Unless further recollections from Morno, or some other evidence that we're missing should surface, I'm inclined to call both "versions of the First print".  Those with black folders will tend to fetch a higher price.

Foul

I'd be interested to hear from anyone who has a 24-page version (regardless of print or cover).  Those are my bet for "xeroxed" -- and I believe there's quite a few of them.

Foul