afoolandhis$ wrote:Nice work, clarkie.
afoolandhis$ wrote:My "Rick Bauer" copy of the foldered version will be arriving soon. Then I should be better able to understand the subtleties of the map grids/printing issues.
harami2000 wrote: Ah... I thought that one would be settled "out of court". Did he actually say what he was hoping to get (re. the estimate), as opposed to what was paid?Or (more importantly, IMO), whether he did buy that copy at GenCon (for $500) a couple of years ago.Would be one less copy to account for and a useful indication on price/condition in that particular auction context, if so.
afoolandhis$ wrote:No, I asked him after the auction how much I had missed the reserve by, and he just sent me a second-chance offer at my bid. Probably paid a little too much, I know...
afoolandhis$ wrote:I'll ask him about GenCon. :?
Quite a lot of my older work - both painted and digital - showed influences from ancient and medieval sources, especially the influence of celtic art. I guess this came about from my reading a lot of history and mythology while I was young, when I was keenly interested in Irish matters because my two grandmothers were from Irish-American families.
morno (monotonous, tepid, lukewarm, from mùirn, -e, affectionate joy, tenderness ?).
afoolandhis$ wrote:Received the foldered PoVQ from Rick Bauer today. It's got 24, single-sided white pages inside. No yellow pages.
killjoy32 wrote:hope this helps?Al
mbassoc2003 wrote:afoolandhis$ wrote:Received the foldered PoVQ from Rick Bauer today. It's got 24, single-sided white pages inside. No yellow pages.No yellow pages? Is this yet another variation in the first printing? Seems as though there were many small print runs of the PoVQ 'first printing'.Any chance of you putting up photos of the other pages?
killjoy32 wrote:actually david, in addition to what was just said there...the "crimp" in the middle of the page... Amanda has just come in and i was just showing her the pics of the pages....she suggested that it might be some form of watermark on the page itself?
bclarkie wrote:killjoy32 wrote:actually david, in addition to what was just said there...the "crimp" in the middle of the page... Amanda has just come in and i was just showing her the pics of the pages....she suggested that it might be some form of watermark on the page itself?If I might interject, I don't think watermarks were possible in the 70's were they, especially from a small printing company. I figure watermarks would not have been established until much more sophisticated computers were around to do it, although as proven earlier today, I could be wrong.