Adam Shultz wrote:harami2000 wrote:Where did you obtain that DG from? Hoping it can be dated far enough back to give it the thumbs up (and addition to the site's printing list).I bought it off of ebay. It is represented in the auction history page as the $400 and change circa 2000.
harami2000 wrote:Where did you obtain that DG from? Hoping it can be dated far enough back to give it the thumbs up (and addition to the site's printing list).
Adam Shultz wrote:harami2000 wrote:Does that mean the previous "OK. Hows about Black Folder PotVQ (NM) + 1st DG + Vanquished Foe = Dragon11 ?" offer has just vanished from the table? I wouldn't say it is off of the table just yet. I would like to confirm a bit more before unloading. The condition of the PotVQ is simply too good to let go in this deal.
harami2000 wrote:Does that mean the previous "OK. Hows about Black Folder PotVQ (NM) + 1st DG + Vanquished Foe = Dragon11 ?" offer has just vanished from the table?
harami2000 wrote:Yep, like a gold ink. It looks exactly like it looks on the Acaeum's third print.
bclarkie wrote:Okay, please stop talking about all these rare items, it is making me crazy. Every item being discussed about being traded is on my now short wish list.
harami2000 wrote:Adam Shultz wrote:I wouldn't say it is off of the table just yet. I would like to confirm a bit more before unloading. The condition of the PotVQ is simply too good to let go in this deal.Heh. So that was a "no", immediately followed by a "yes" in response to my question, Adam? (I think my avvy would be biting his tail just now! )
Adam Shultz wrote:I wouldn't say it is off of the table just yet. I would like to confirm a bit more before unloading. The condition of the PotVQ is simply too good to let go in this deal.
afoolandhis$ wrote:Was going to post about the intro page on my foldered version, but went back in this thread and realized I had already done so.
afoolandhis$ wrote:To recap, the intro page (on the left, below) has no scrollwork, and is white. The copyright page is also white, and is glued into the back of the folder.
Adam Shultz wrote:harami2000 wrote:Heh. So that was a "no", immediately followed by a "yes" in response to my question, Adam? (I think my avvy would be biting his tail just now! )You dealing with someone who is seasoned from trading with Mike Kuo for a couple of years. Lots of double talk and frustration culminating in a spectacular fit of aggression to the post office where you send and pick up what the gem that you are really glad you hung in there for.
harami2000 wrote:Heh. So that was a "no", immediately followed by a "yes" in response to my question, Adam? (I think my avvy would be biting his tail just now! )
harami2000 wrote:Heya, Mike....Also, your copy already had one missing map page which was replaced by a tri-folded copy. (Was that a TSR photocopy or just "low on ink"? Please remind me!).
a2jeff wrote:I'll be posting a separate thread on The Character Archaic and my findings on this particular copy, in addition to notarized comments from Pete soon. If anyone has a printing of CA, please chime in so we can do some comparisions when the time comes.
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote:Heya, Mike....Also, your copy already had one missing map page which was replaced by a tri-folded copy. (Was that a TSR photocopy or just "low on ink"? Please remind me!).David,Are you confusing my copy with I/O's? I believe my foldered PoVQ - which I won from Rick Bauer - is complete.
afoolandhis$ wrote:I tend to agree with the hypothesis that the yellow cover sheet was added later.
harami2000 wrote:No, I'm just confusing you with Mike <IO>... *edits post*. Sorry, Stephen!
harami2000 wrote:Out of interest, did Rick confirm that this was the $500 GenCon copy from a year or two back?
harami2000 wrote: Hey, ho! If we could discard those earlier dates from Pete, it does appeal in that a (genuinely as-issued) missing "cover"/scrollwork sheet in some black folders (which partially duplicates the "contents" section of the white sheet, anyhow) would tally with the black folder being "earlier".But it is still "stuck" at June 1976 given that pasted copyright sheet (in all known copies?).Hrrrr.....
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote:Out of interest, did Rick confirm that this was the $500 GenCon copy from a year or two back?Nope. I asked him twice, but never got an answer. He was stationed in Bahrain, if I recall correctly, so might be a bit busy.
afoolandhis$ wrote:harami2000 wrote:But it is still "stuck" at June 1976 given that pasted copyright sheet (in all known copies?).Didn't someone post here within the past half-year or so about a foldered version lacking the glued-in copyright page? Or am I just recalling one of my own wishful thoughts?
harami2000 wrote:But it is still "stuck" at June 1976 given that pasted copyright sheet (in all known copies?).
and this made me laugh a LOT! Error 404 - Not found
AdderMcOne wrote:and this made me laugh a LOT! Error 404 - Not foundROTFLI wonder how much he'll mark up the extravagent prices he's wanting to purchase them for in order to re-sell ?