Mordenkainen wrote in Nobleknight:It blows my mind that they think they can list items at these price points with stock photos and so little information. The whole "ask us if you need to know more" paradigm really puts me off.
sauromatian wrote in Nobleknight:"Ebay is the worst form of market, until you consider the alternatives." -Winston Churchill, if Churchill had been a collector of vintage role-playing gamesMost retailers would find the idea odd that every individual copy should get multiple photos from every angle. Maybe it would be better to try & describe the issue as one of feng shui, so that the average order-fulfilment worker can relate. We could try to explain to them how some signs of wear & tear on an item will evoke memories of childhood, & the careless abandon with which we once approached life. Other forms of damage to an item might be more inauspicious, perhaps evoking memories of pain & loss, or personal imitations which curb our potential even today in the foggy dotage of the collector's harsh path. They'll sympathize, I'm sure of it. Or you could just stick to Ebay.
Sir Kill Alot wrote in Nobleknight:I believe anything over $600 and they show the actual item (which this auction states).
Sir Kill Alot wrote in Nobleknight:I know NK prices can sometimes be borderline absurd,
Sir Kill Alot wrote in Nobleknight:but I I've never had a bad experience with them and I bought from Aaron when he was just an AOL account. I know he's stepped back from the day to day operations but their reputation is still solid.
Sir Kill Alot wrote in Nobleknight:I am also in the group of people who won't buy anything if a stock picture is being shown and not the actual item.
Mordenkainen wrote in Nobleknight:Would you buy this woody off a listing with one picture?
