Marlith wrote:I am sure I overpaid but there was somthing that looked different about these to me so I wanted to take a gamble. Was it just me or do these look different in some way than than what they normally look like?http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... RK:MEWA:IT
mbassoc2003 wrote:Marlith wrote:I am sure I overpaid but there was somthing that looked different about these to me so I wanted to take a gamble. Was it just me or do these look different in some way than than what they normally look like?http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... RK:MEWA:ITI see no logos? Did the monos not carry TSR's logo on the front?
bclarkie wrote:mbassoc2003 wrote:I see no logos? Did the monos not carry TSR's logo on the front?I think the way that the pictures were taken just cuts off the logos on the bottom. Other than that, I don't see anything irregular about them. Is there somehting specific you were looking at?
mbassoc2003 wrote:I see no logos? Did the monos not carry TSR's logo on the front?
Marlith wrote:Nothing I could pin down. Ever see something and it just looks different for some reason? I spent a little more than I wanted to but I wanted to see them. If you folks don't see anything unusual it was probably just me. I will post a message if they are different in some way. Thanks for all the inout.
deimos3428 wrote:Marlith wrote:Nothing I could pin down. Ever see something and it just looks different for some reason? I spent a little more than I wanted to but I wanted to see them. If you folks don't see anything unusual it was probably just me. I will post a message if they are different in some way. Thanks for all the inout.The modules look to be in very good condition, which always makes me suspicious if I don't know the seller. Although it could be an honest mistake, if I was looking specifically for an early printing, I wouldn't bid with out a full scan. These could easily be the 1999 (5th printings) from the silver aniversary set.See: http://www.acaeum.com/DDIndexes/ModPages/G.html
Marlith wrote:I had thought about that. But the printing looked too light at the bottom and the modules looked too worn. I also think the color was richer on the reprints. I guess it could be someone manipulating images. If it is then just a negative feedback I will most likely have to eat.
bclarkie wrote:Marlith wrote:I had thought about that. But the printing looked too light at the bottom and the modules looked too worn. I also think the color was richer on the reprints. I guess it could be someone manipulating images. If it is then just a negative feedback I will most likely have to eat.I agree with your assesment. Looking at thos pics I think those are earlier prints, if only because of the staining on them. The staining on them IMO makes them look of an older version. If they are early prints, that is a pretty good price for them. Even if they are not though, even the ones in the Silver aniversry set are probably worth $15-20 if you sell them individually.
killjoy32 wrote:bclarkie wrote: I agree with your assesment. Looking at thos pics I think those are earlier prints, if only because of the staining on them. The staining on them IMO makes them look of an older version. If they are early prints, that is a pretty good price for them. Even if they are not though, even the ones in the Silver aniversry set are probably worth $15-20 if you sell them individually. oh are they now? *chik ching $$$$* goes off to find his spare ones to auction to raise money for his impulsive buying techniques
bclarkie wrote: I agree with your assesment. Looking at thos pics I think those are earlier prints, if only because of the staining on them. The staining on them IMO makes them look of an older version. If they are early prints, that is a pretty good price for them. Even if they are not though, even the ones in the Silver aniversry set are probably worth $15-20 if you sell them individually.
killjoy32 wrote:bclarkie wrote:Even if they are not though, even the ones in the Silver aniversry set are probably worth $15-20 if you sell them individually. oh are they now? *chik ching $$$$* goes off to find his spare ones to auction to raise money for his impulsive buying techniques
bclarkie wrote:Even if they are not though, even the ones in the Silver aniversry set are probably worth $15-20 if you sell them individually.
harami2000 wrote:killjoy32 wrote:oh are they now? *chik ching $$$$* goes off to find his spare ones to auction to raise money for his impulsive buying techniquesI thought you bought your L3s "free-range"
killjoy32 wrote:oh are they now? *chik ching $$$$* goes off to find his spare ones to auction to raise money for his impulsive buying techniques
killjoy32 wrote:harami2000 wrote:I thought you bought your L3s "free-range" hey! gimme a break i needed it to complete the set! i just have spare other items now thats all maybe i need to get more L3's to make up the number nah. cant afford that now so someone else can make a muppet of themselves for once
harami2000 wrote:I thought you bought your L3s "free-range"
harami2000 wrote:*g*. Sorry, Alan! Anyhow; you're not sat on a $360 Tegel... Is that worth a mega-muppet award?(On the plus side, L3 is very unlikely to appear cheap in "mixed lots" for the foreseeable future).Happy Giant hunting to ya
mbassoc2003 wrote:Two PoVQ's, one for the collection to keep all minty, and one for scribbling on.
