killjoy32 wrote:next time, believe me, i will be bidding a fair bit more than that - no bloody museum in florida is gonna get em next time!
johnhuck wrote:killjoy32 wrote:next time, believe me, i will be bidding a fair bit more than that - no bloody museum in florida is gonna get em next time! Next time you might not need to.
killjoy32 wrote:johnhuck wrote:Next time you might not need to. we shall see. these are top of my list of "wants" now.btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAl
johnhuck wrote:Next time you might not need to.
johnhuck wrote:killjoy32 wrote:btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAlI can trade a TC#9 if thats any use?
killjoy32 wrote:btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAl
harami2000 wrote:(erm, thread overflow...)
killjoy32 wrote:oh yeah...sorry chummer...
harami2000 wrote:(And eBay is only ever an indication of what the 2nd highest bid is
johnhuck wrote:harami2000 wrote:(And eBay is only ever an indication of what the 2nd highest bid is+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)
harami2000 wrote:johnhuck wrote:+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)yup
johnhuck wrote:+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)
killjoy32 wrote:well nobody read my bid on them beholders....i thought hey aint gonna give david another angle on analysing me