Deadlord36 wrote:I'll take a mint B2 over a VG Tsoj any day. Haven't the prices on B2's been hot at auction lately?Come on, the valuations can easily be done with member input and common sense. Here's a demo:Rahasia VG: $700-$800Character Archaic VG: $200-$300Fazzlewood VG: $800-$1,000DG 1st VG: $500+If anyone wants to argue my valuations, feel free, but do not quote 4 year old auction prices. Give me valid reasons why these prices are off. If anything, they are still low.
afoolandhis$ wrote:I think the recent auctions speak for themselves. Some ebay bidders who aren't necessarily members of this site will no doubt use the posted valuations as guidelines when bidding/sniping, but all of us here know what we'd pay to pick up one of the rares. As a consequence, we also have a pretty good sense of what to expect our stuff to go for.Example: before he put his Tsojconth up on ebay, I think Deimos may have been a bit concerned about the hit they took in the recent valuations update, but in the end he got more for it than what it was listed at.
bclarkie wrote:Example: before he put his Tsojconth up on ebay, I think Deimos may have been a bit concerned about the hit they took in the recent valuations update, but in the end he got more for it than what it was listed at.
killjoy32 wrote: saying that....if i really want something, i couldnt give a rats crap what the valuation is, i want it and so will bid whatever it takes to get it. i think to a degree, it goes like that for a lot of ppl, especially among the very rare items.Al
bclarkie wrote: The valuations are in no means a way of telling someone what they should pay or not pay, it is just a guide.
killjoy32 wrote:....if i really want something, i couldnt give a rats crap what the valuation is, i want it and so will bid whatever it takes to get it.
johnhuck wrote:viewtopic.php?p=31546#31546viewtopic.php?p=31901#31901
killjoy32 wrote:next time, believe me, i will be bidding a fair bit more than that - no bloody museum in florida is gonna get em next time!
johnhuck wrote:killjoy32 wrote:next time, believe me, i will be bidding a fair bit more than that - no bloody museum in florida is gonna get em next time! Next time you might not need to.
killjoy32 wrote:johnhuck wrote:Next time you might not need to. we shall see. these are top of my list of "wants" now.btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAl
johnhuck wrote:Next time you might not need to.
johnhuck wrote:killjoy32 wrote:btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAlI can trade a TC#9 if thats any use?
killjoy32 wrote:btw john, i have duplicates of #22 #23 and #24 okAl
harami2000 wrote:(erm, thread overflow...)
killjoy32 wrote:oh yeah...sorry chummer...
harami2000 wrote:(And eBay is only ever an indication of what the 2nd highest bid is
johnhuck wrote:harami2000 wrote:(And eBay is only ever an indication of what the 2nd highest bid is+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)
harami2000 wrote:johnhuck wrote:+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)yup
johnhuck wrote:+ the standard increment (unless you're very good at "reading" other peoples bids)
killjoy32 wrote:well nobody read my bid on them beholders....i thought hey aint gonna give david another angle on analysing me