Valuations ^^
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 4 of 612, 3, 4, 56
Author


Sage Collector

Posts: 2639
Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 11, 2006

Post Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:29 pm 
 

Deadlord36 wrote:You're kidding, right? Those are the current "values"?


Last updated 6/2005, per current Page Not Found, etc., pages. Yup...

(Hence my observation about Mike<IO> being able to trade in his 2nd Chain for a 1st, soon enough, on a one-for-one basis! ;))

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:12 pm 
 

Just to clarify on the above listed values, and you can correct me if I am wrong, but those would be the values for VG condition of those items.


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Sage Collector

Posts: 2639
Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 11, 2006

Post Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:21 pm 
 

bclarkie wrote:Just to clarify on the above listed values, and you can correct me if I am wrong, but those would be the values for VG condition of those items.


*nods* "VG grade prices" as stated, Brian. ;)

The "2005/02 -> 2005/06 trend" comments are really "notes" to be read alongside the up/down arrows currently displayed.



Interesting to scan through, I thought...

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:30 pm 
 

Then basing that on data *collected* as of 6/2005, with the exception of the seemingly decending value of the 1st edition chainmail which can be expained by the total lack of sales history in the last 2 years and the weighting on current sales(otherwise we would just be pulling numbers out of our arses), everything else seems okay to me. :?


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Sage Collector

Posts: 2639
Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visit: Jan 11, 2006

Post Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:33 pm 
 

thx for checking. :)

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5686
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Dec 01, 2022
Location: New Hampsha

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:04 am 
 

VG grade prices:

                         2001/08   2003/06   2004/12   2005/02   2005/06   2005/02 -> 2005/06 trend

Chainmail 1st                 350       750       500       440       345  

Chainmail 2nd                 175       175       175       180       225  

OD&D 1st                      750      1250      1250      1000      1275  

OD&D 2nd                      350       650       650       460       525   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

OD&D 3rd                      350       350       350       310       360   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

B3 orange                     250       250       250       320       429  

L3                                       20        20        20        25   (not shown as an increase)

ST1                           650      1000      1000       775      1215  

Dwarven Glory 1st             175       500       500       210       360  

Dwarven Glory 2nd              65        65        65       105       135  

Dwarven Glory 3rd              65        65        65        90       129  

G/Tower of Inverness tourney  400       650       650       450       765    

Jade Hare (w/cover)           350       650       650       450       570  

Lost Caverns of Tsojconth     400       650       650       450       480   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

Lost Tamoachan tourney        400       650       650       450       600  

PotVQ (black folder)          175       500       500       330       360   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

PotVQ (3rd)                   175       350       350       180       210   (not shown as an increase)  

Pharaoh                       350       650       650       500       660  

Quest for the Fazzlewood 1st  300       500       500       330       615  

Quest for the Fazzlewood 2nd  150       350       350       330       615  

Rahasia                       350       650       650       500       540   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

10th Anniv. Collector's Set    50       200       200       180       315  

Character Archaic              90       175       175       125       138   (shown as a decrease, actually increased)

Silver Anniv. Collector's Edn.           15        15        16        25   (not shown as an increase)  

Strategic Preview #3-6 (ea.)                       80        45     54-75  







Well, if anyone has any of the above items in VG condition and wants to sell them for the current prices, let me know and I will cut you a check immediately.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

 WWW  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:11 am 
 

I would be happy to if I had any of the listed items.  :)


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8241
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Mar 05, 2022
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:12 am 
 

Deadlord36 wrote:
Well, if anyone has any of the above items in VG condition and wants to sell them for the current prices, let me know and I will cut you a check immediately.




ya know frank, you just beat me to the punch there. i will have one of everything of the above please.



PM me when youre ready :D


Are we nearly there yet?

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:18 am 
 

Once again, these figure are *not* a figment of anyones imagination, they are based on actual eBay sales. If someone has a system out there to give approximate values of items other than saying "Well, I know that item(s) is worth more than that", please feel free to post it. I am sure everyone on the board and Scott is going to be all ears.



<edit>



And for those not familiar with the system that we currently use, here are a couple links from the site:



Page Not Found



Page Not Found


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3066
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Last Visit: Apr 30, 2015

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:36 am 
 

Keep in mind the valuations are always out of date.  This is unavoidable without some sort of intelligent, real-time collector.  



For example, my Tsoj. auction will undoubtedly have an effect on the value of that most recent VG valuation, (though I have no idea to what extent until the numbers are crunched).  :wink:   Would I have sold it for $480?  Heck no.

 YIM  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5686
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Dec 01, 2022
Location: New Hampsha

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:39 am 
 

Unless I am missing something, I haven't seen any of those in VG condition on eBay recently. Let's be realistic, a 1st print Chainmail with dog crap on it MIGHT go for only $350. I know I and most everyone else here would pay more.

Personally, I think the only real way to get accurate values for those items would be to accept submissions from Acaeum members on what they personally think they are worth, and average the totals, throwing out idiotic valuations. Then it could be voted on by the same members.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

 WWW  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:42 am 
 

Deadlord36 wrote:.... throwing out idiotic valuations.




Truthfully though, where is exactly that line drawn and who decides it?



Additionaly, if we would use that type of system, then we are allowing someone's own feelings(corrupted by their own motives one way or another) to place a value on an item. In a perfect world in principle a system like that might work, but in reality it is not a perfect world. You may not even mean to increase/decrease a value of an item based on your own personal opinions(and I am including myself), but it is going to happen. Unfortunately the system we use is not perfect, nor will it probably ever be perfect, but at this point it is best available. :)



BTW, the system in place is a living system and it is not etched in stone.  We do listen to concerns and are trying to make the system in place better if we see an issue.  :)


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 8241
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Last Visit: Mar 05, 2022
Location: Wallasey, Merseyside, UK

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:51 am 
 

bclarkie wrote:
Deadlord36 wrote:.... throwing out idiotic valuations.




being fair tho, the line would be drawn in the fact there are how many? other members on the valuation "team" who are also placing a value on an item.



lets be very honest, the prices shown on that list, you tell me anyone on this forum who wouldnt snap at anything there for the values shown?



as deim just said, would he sell the tsoj for the value shown...er no.... so does that not make a mockery of what is stated?



anyway, i hope y'all get it sorted one way or the other :)



mind you if anyone has 2 or 3 tsoj's for that price, i will have the lot :D


Are we nearly there yet?

  


Grandstanding Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 6455
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Last Visit: Sep 10, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:03 pm 
 

killjoy32 wrote:

being fair tho, the line would be drawn in the fact there are how many? other members on the valuation "team" who are also placing a value on an item.




We don't place value on any item, the people who bid on EBay do.



killjoy32 wrote: as deim just said, would he sell the tsoj for the value shown...er no.... so does that not make a mockery of what is stated?




As I recall a VG Tsoj went at GenCon 1 month ago for $450.00. Granted we do not use those figures when calculating values, but that is a reality. Also, you cant put a value on what somebody is willing to part with an item for. I could say my B2 is worth $1000.00 to me. You and everyone else may think that I am a freaking idiot, and I may very well be, but does that mean we should include that in the valuation process, because hey its worth that to me. What makes my opinion any less important than anyone elses? Unfortuantely in order for the system to work and be accurate we have to base the valuations on actual numbers of past auctions. Granted this system is somewhat flawed based on the principle that is based on past values, but using anything other than previous values would be simply a guess and pure speculation.


"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." -Neitzche

  


Active Collector

Posts: 29
Joined: Dec 10, 2002
Last Visit: Apr 15, 2021
Location: Palo Alto, CA

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:30 pm 
 

Comparing values from June 2003 -> June 2005, there were 43 decreases in value vs. 41 increases, not accounting for inflation.  Total dollar value of the column went from $15,339 in 2003, "up" to $15,358, a nominal increase, while being a slight "real" decrease of about 6% if you factor in a 3% inflation.  I had expected to see more increases.  Total dollar volume has probably increased, and a few high profile auctions such as the Kuntz collection have definitely boosted spending on rare items.  Has the market for Chainmail 1sts and woodgrains been saturated and people are moving on to manuscripts and other one-offs?  ;-)

  

User avatar

Grandstanding Collector

Posts: 5686
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Last Visit: Dec 01, 2022
Location: New Hampsha

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 1:14 pm 
 

I'll take a mint B2 over a VG Tsoj any day. Haven't the prices on B2's been hot at auction lately?

Come on, the valuations can easily be done with member input and common sense. Here's a demo:



Rahasia VG: $700-$800

Character Archaic VG: $200-$300

Fazzlewood VG: $800-$1,000

DG 1st VG: $500+



If anyone wants to argue my valuations, feel free, but do not quote 4 year old auction prices. Give me valid reasons why these prices are off. If anything, they are still low.


If you hit a Rowsdower, you get to keep it.

 WWW  

User avatar

Verbose Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 1709
Joined: Feb 04, 2004
Last Visit: Aug 23, 2016
Location: Chandler, AZ

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:01 pm 
 

Things seem to be kicking off at the right time . . .  :D   I am just finishing up assembling (and gathering) what data there currently is and will (hopefully) send it out to Foul by the end of the weekend.

There have been many good points made and I'll go ahead and add a little to the discussion.

First off, it should be understood that tracking value "trends" over the last few years may not give very accurate info as I don't think many values were updated with any frequency (thus the Valuation Board).

On top of that, the "Beta" values that were first presented also had sketchy values as well as too many grades and a % scale for lower grades that was too low.  I spent a lot of time considering everything and prososed a "revised" system that has met with general approval (though as has been noted, things are constantly being "tinkered" with and can be altered as needed).

The current scale consists of 6 categories with higher relative values.  The 10.0 grade has been taken away from MINT and assigned to NEAR MINT.  This is one major reason some of the values may seem to have not changed from the original BETAs.  In most cases, the NM value did increase (though it was often less than the previous MINT value.

To better illustrate this, take a look at the VG grade.  It stands at 60% of the NM value.  This is not an unreasonable number . . . you may argue that it should be somewhat higher . . . or somewhat lower.  Perhaps it could be 50% for "common" items and 70% for Rarity 5's?  Sliding scales have been considered and met with some approval and some disapproval.  It is something that is always being considered . . .



As for the Chainmail 1st and 2nd edition?   We all know it was undervalued, but there was no current data (at least until Burntwire sold his which will be reflected in the current valuations).

As for the Tsojconth?  Off the top of my head, I believe the last two auctions have impacted the value to increase NM to $950 and VG to $575.  I think that is fairly representative . . . as least as far as a guide goes.

Older auctions do carry progressively less weight . . . as Deadlord mentions "don't quote me prices from five years ago".  I agree for the most part . . . it is easy with Tsojconth as there is so much data.  But for others there is very little to go by.

As for GenCon auctions:  I definitely agree that eBay is not the "be all and end all" for values.  If anyone has any hard data on GenCon auctions with approximate grades then send it to me.  I don't see why it couldn't be used.   Acaeum classifieds?  Also good in many cases though we are left with the question of "honesty".  Personally, I think it best to take people at their word.  If you run an Acaeum classifieds like Dathon for his pre-pub or Stormber for his 1st Woodie, then contact me with the results (I think confirmation from both the seller and buyer would suffice).  I'm always looking for help . . .

Deadlord echoes previous sentiments about "submitted" values.  This sounds like a good idea in principle, but has been rejected for a variety of reasons.  I won't lie . . . it's not going to happen on a large scale.  The purpose of the VB is to present values based on sales and grades.  In some minor cases, interpretation has taken a very  small role and even this will be lessened as more data comes through.

The market does tent to fluctuate quite a bit.  After all, it is a small core of collector's who spend the big bucks.  Not too long ago, Deadlord sold an Inverness for @ 1,600.  And not too long after, his other Inverness didn't meet the reserve (I could be wrong, but I think bidding fizzled out around the $800-900 mark?  Four months later, another goes for $1,500.  Where was everyone who would pay the VG price of $765 on Deadlord's second auction?

I think this post has rambled on long enough, however . . .  By the way, if there are any on these forums who don't know, I am the moderator of the Valuation Board (taking over after darkseraphim left).  Though everyone on the VB contributes, I have taken it upon myself to suggest, modify and help devise much of the system in place - building upon darkseraphim's framework and incorporating the suggestions of board members, regular forum discussions and my own ideas.  Anyone should feel free to PM, email ( [email protected] ) or post messages if they like.  

Paul


"Gleemonex makes it feel like it's seventy-two degrees in your head... all... the... time! "

  


Long-Winded Collector
Acaeum Donor

Posts: 3804
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Last Visit: Nov 14, 2022

Post Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:02 pm 
 

I think the recent auctions speak for themselves.  Some ebay bidders who aren't necessarily members of this site will no doubt use the posted valuations as guidelines when bidding/sniping, but all of us here know what we'd pay to pick up one of the rares.  As a consequence, we also have a pretty good sense of what to expect our stuff to go for.



Example:  before he put his Tsojconth up on ebay, I think Deimos may have been a bit concerned about the hit they took in the recent valuations update, but in the end he got more for it than what it was listed at.

  
PreviousNext
Post new topic Reply to topic Page 4 of 612, 3, 4, 56