bclarkie wrote:ifearyeti wrote:States third printing on copyright page?Hey David, could you be so kind as to post what you find out with this book when you get it. I actually helped you out with my bid and didn't even realize. I maxed out the high bidder with my own semi-curious bid on that one.
ifearyeti wrote:States third printing on copyright page?
bclarkie wrote:BTW, I love your Avatar.
harami2000 wrote:harami2000 wrote:It is an original, but the fading on the right-hand side of the image requires explaining, I think: have checked a few of their other auctions and not apparent on any of those, even with the same lens(?).Difficult to explain, given that the spine looks so good. (Temporary camera or digital image processing problem, phps?).Thanks, whoever asked... Q: Hi - I am sure you have been asked about this already - it seems a wee bit faded on the right hand side - is this surface rubbing? Ta. SMA: Yes,looks like surface rubbing & not the printing.(So much for the description of condition as originally given! Strange how only the right hand side of the cover was affected; yet is so extensive, there...).
harami2000 wrote:It is an original, but the fading on the right-hand side of the image requires explaining, I think: have checked a few of their other auctions and not apparent on any of those, even with the same lens(?).Difficult to explain, given that the spine looks so good. (Temporary camera or digital image processing problem, phps?).
harami2000 wrote:Hrmm... Does anyone know whether this is actually going to fit Frank Mentzer?Somehow I'd envisioned him as being a bit taller... [ Image ](No refund on that score I trust, Burnie Bros.? )http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5203165565$5 with 1 1/2 days to go(Noticed he'd already snagged the modelling clay sets...).
red_bus wrote: That was me - perhaps it looks worse in the photo - but I think that this is probably at about the right price for a WD #1 in that condition.Strange how it gets you - I only bought my first WDs six months ago and thought "well I will be happy to have all the first ten"... now I am scouring ebay trying to complete 1-100 and yesterday I cought myself bidding on Imagine magazines?!?
red_bus wrote:That was me - perhaps it looks worse in the photo - but I think that this is probably at about the right price for a WD #1 in that condition.
red_bus wrote:Strange how it gets you - I only bought my first WDs six months ago and thought "well I will be happy to have all the first ten"... now I am scouring ebay trying to complete 1-100 and yesterday I cought myself bidding on Imagine magazines?!?
Ralf Toth wrote:Wild Things + Dark & Hidden Ways. 1 day 10 hours, $12... but the condition.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5203134618
bclarkie wrote:Also, from a different seller Dragon Magazines #2 & #3:http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... %3AIT&rd=1http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... %3AIT&rd=1
bclarkie wrote:Maybe these 2 are an indication of finally a down swing to the early Dragons. There wasn't a quiltmom anywhere in sight. I had #3 on the cheap if I wanted it, but I just decided not to pull the trigger. I will probably regret that eventually.
burntwire wrote:harami2000 wrote:[ Image ](No refund on that score I trust, Burnie Bros.? )I am sure it won't fit Frank. He is not a small person.
harami2000 wrote:[ Image ](No refund on that score I trust, Burnie Bros.? )
burntwire wrote:BTW:The items we have listed this week are still a bargain considering how hard they are to come by. If Frank wins them I am sure he will get more for them at GenCon.
harami2000 wrote:Was watching... Yeah, on the plus side, <quiltmom> appears to be happy with one of each (usually?).Wouldn't have said that was overly "cheap" for #3 ($60), even though it looked like a pretty good copy- trimmed scan not withstanding.
bbarsh wrote:Ok, I know I have out of the loop, but who in the hell is this guy??http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 94208&rd=1
bclarkie wrote:I am however going to not going to spare EBay and will be promptly be reposrting him for having his lying accusation in his auction. Hey Kev, since I know you are reading this. BYE BYE AGAIN.
harami2000 wrote:bclarkie wrote:I am however going to not going to spare EBay and will be promptly be reposrting him for having his lying accusation in his auction. Hey Kev, since I know you are reading this. BYE BYE AGAIN. *lol*. That's one angry Martian Warrior! Can I get him for libel, first?(Pity I'm not a reseller, so I could sue him for potential loss of business, too. *hint*).
bclarkie wrote:I already report him to ebay and I also sent him a nice email thanking him for libeling me. Anyone know a good lawyer? And Seriously some make a jpeg of that auction listing, we are going to need it.