youffie404 wrote:Something valuable ?http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... eName=WDVW
deimos3428 wrote: I don't understand the sellers actions, though. I've never left a negative yet, even though I've had several buyers back out on auctions. Yes, I'm out a couple of cents in Ebay fees. That's not worth a retaliatory negative, and not worth leaving one, either. (Maybe it's safe once you have a couple thousand positives under your belt.) It's far better to inform the buyer you're relisting, leave no feedback/positive feedback stating "auction cancelled at buyer's request", and move on. (With the non-paying bidder option, you might even get partial fees back.)
harami2000 wrote:muaddib5 wrote:WHITE DWARF ISSUE ONEhttp://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 79167&rd=1It is an original, but the fading on the right-hand side of the image requires explaining, I think: have checked a few of their other auctions and not apparent on any of those, even with the same lens(?).Difficult to explain, given that the spine looks so good. (Temporary camera or digital image processing problem, phps?).
muaddib5 wrote:WHITE DWARF ISSUE ONEhttp://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 79167&rd=1
bclarkie wrote:ifearyeti wrote:States third printing on copyright page?Hey David, could you be so kind as to post what you find out with this book when you get it. I actually helped you out with my bid and didn't even realize. I maxed out the high bidder with my own semi-curious bid on that one.
ifearyeti wrote:States third printing on copyright page?
bclarkie wrote:BTW, I love your Avatar.
harami2000 wrote:harami2000 wrote:It is an original, but the fading on the right-hand side of the image requires explaining, I think: have checked a few of their other auctions and not apparent on any of those, even with the same lens(?).Difficult to explain, given that the spine looks so good. (Temporary camera or digital image processing problem, phps?).Thanks, whoever asked... Q: Hi - I am sure you have been asked about this already - it seems a wee bit faded on the right hand side - is this surface rubbing? Ta. SMA: Yes,looks like surface rubbing & not the printing.(So much for the description of condition as originally given! Strange how only the right hand side of the cover was affected; yet is so extensive, there...).
harami2000 wrote:It is an original, but the fading on the right-hand side of the image requires explaining, I think: have checked a few of their other auctions and not apparent on any of those, even with the same lens(?).Difficult to explain, given that the spine looks so good. (Temporary camera or digital image processing problem, phps?).
harami2000 wrote:Hrmm... Does anyone know whether this is actually going to fit Frank Mentzer?Somehow I'd envisioned him as being a bit taller... [ Image ](No refund on that score I trust, Burnie Bros.? )http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5203165565$5 with 1 1/2 days to go(Noticed he'd already snagged the modelling clay sets...).
red_bus wrote: That was me - perhaps it looks worse in the photo - but I think that this is probably at about the right price for a WD #1 in that condition.Strange how it gets you - I only bought my first WDs six months ago and thought "well I will be happy to have all the first ten"... now I am scouring ebay trying to complete 1-100 and yesterday I cought myself bidding on Imagine magazines?!?
red_bus wrote:That was me - perhaps it looks worse in the photo - but I think that this is probably at about the right price for a WD #1 in that condition.
red_bus wrote:Strange how it gets you - I only bought my first WDs six months ago and thought "well I will be happy to have all the first ten"... now I am scouring ebay trying to complete 1-100 and yesterday I cought myself bidding on Imagine magazines?!?
Ralf Toth wrote:Wild Things + Dark & Hidden Ways. 1 day 10 hours, $12... but the condition.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 5203134618