RWilson wrote:Perhaps your definition of "using" a pdf is different than mine- I just read the damn things, and I have NO intention of making money from them. Sheesh, if I like it enough I will buy a copy of the legit thing.
killjoy32 wrote:RWilson wrote:Perhaps your definition of "using" a pdf is different than mine- I just read the damn things, and I have NO intention of making money from them. Sheesh, if I like it enough I will buy a copy of the legit thing.i don't think DL 36 was out to insult anyone with his comment but his point was very strong and well made though.PDF files are just the same as MP3's. you can look at it in whatever way you want, but its true.do mp3's affect the music industry? theres your answer. pdf's are no different. Al
GraysonAC wrote:No doubt, it's still morally and legally wrong to own PDFs of stuff you don't own a hardcopy of. Although I'm not sure it's theft, if it isn't, it's thus only because of technicalities - it's still a violation of copyright.That being said, I've got pdfs and mp3s that I shouldn't have, and the moral implications don't keep me up at night.
mbassoc2003 wrote:I doubt that the overwhelming abundance of 3E pirate CDs on eBay are affecting whenther people buy into 3E D&D.
Blackmoor wrote:Anybody who thinks PDF's, photocopies or other rip-off's do not impact the market is just plain wrong