stormber wrote:harami2000 wrote:Still not happy with the confidently repeated "again, 40,000 copies"... sounds like 200,000 copies shifted in the first 3-4 months? Where would that have put the
DMG on the best seller's list?
What did they make that year? 8 million profit?
1979/80? Out by a
huge margin, Paul (factor of 10, give or take). I was well aware of that, but awaited any further progress/comments on the topic rather than just hogging the thread.
Combining the turnover figures from Dragon #35,
Manga &
Yahoo! GeoCities: Get a web site with easy-to-use site building tools....
7/77-6/78 "near $1 million"
7/78-6/79 "well over $2 million"
7/79-6/80 $4.2 million
7/80-6/81 $16.5 million (profit $4.25 million; stated highest percentage)
=
Say guesstimated $2.1 million sales for the last half of 1979 versus $1.2 million for the first half of 1979.
If every single dollar of sales was DMGs
and nothing else, you'd still be a
long way short of 200,000. Well short of 120,000, even.
Aside from the corresponding increased sales of MMs & PHBs, I'm sure TSR had other products!
The circulation of The Dragon was still a flat 11,000 at that point (Dragon #33) and a few thousand copies of the DMG were shifted at that first GenCon; any more than 5,000 would surely have been noted,
http://php.iupui.edu/~wrporter/Genconhistory.html (thx to btb for that link)
(aside: I hadn't twigged that the releases of the PHB, DMG and D&DG were at successive GenCons. Kinda obvious that should be the case

).
The (hypothetical/PR) figure of half a million
players worldwide was only bandied around into 1980 (Dragon #35). If the Revised Edition DMGs had continued at the purported sales rate above, almost every single (alleged) player would have had a DMG soon after that.
Those repeated printings of 40,000 simply
do not compute in the context of all the above.
The Acaeum listings and
Page Not Found now quote as "fact" numbers which clearly cannot be substantiated.
50,000 copies of the 1st print Monster Manual is clearly also
impossible in the context of the turnover figures above, regardless that you're quoting Gary himself.
I am, too....
(One more attempt... Sanity check, please!)