darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:I should also note here (as I alluded to in Book I) that Jon's research should be regarded as authoritative on the majority of subjects where he and I differ in statements of purported fact, mainly because I cannot match his access to primary sources.
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:I should also note here (as I alluded to in Book I) that Jon's research should be regarded as authoritative on the majority of subjects where he and I differ in statements of purported fact, mainly because I cannot match his access to primary sources. As I explain in the introduction, Hawk & Moor (H&M) is mostly a vacuum cleaner that happily devours facts, trivia, folklore, stories and dungeon adventures and assembles them into a chronological (as opposed to systematically topical) narrative which I hope is both insightful and entertaining. I provide hundreds of footnotes so anyone who wants to know a statement's source and/or inspiration can go chase after it and draw an informed conclusion. The goals of this approach are (a) to preserve thousands of pieces which only exist in temporal electronic form or hidden places, (b) to preserve the game's folkloric history as our mentors fade away and (c) to make the reader feel like they're actually there while events are unfolding, as opposed to learning about events through historical dissertation.I don't have the material resources to match the depth of scholarship exhibited in Playing at the World (PatW), and I take what I find from others who were there (Arneson, Gygax, Kuntz, Moldvay, etc.) at face value until I have reason to doubt them. So I personally recommend PatW as the academic authority, with H&M embodying a supplementary and/or alternative approach to the current primary source research going on. I think they both have independent validity and even complement one another due to variety in the terrain being covered, as well as the different perspectives. Many topics which are dealt with in detail in H&M (such as the contents of the Greyhawk dungeons) are dealt with more lightly based on documentary evidence in PatW, and PatW has details on lots of things that I either treat lightly or choose not to go into. (The gigantic gap which I specifically manifest in H&M regards the detailed pre-1969 history of wargaming.) My advantage of course is that H&M is not yet in print, so I can be nimble and update the ebooks weekly with new discoveries and changes. The latest edits and a couple of new essays will be uploaded to books I-III this weekend.Also, Book I and II are now out from their Amazon exclusivity agreement, which means that (a) I will probably release an epub version and (b) any Acaeum member can feel free to message or e-mail me if they'd like a free .pdf copy of the most recent versions. I probably owe you the entertainment if you've read this far. :P
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:Hi guys, here is a rough draft preview of a new mini-essay which I am adding to the next edition of Hawk & Moor, which discusses one of the earliest "dungeon adventures" in Swords & Sorcery literature: H. P. Lovecraft's The Rats in the Walls, which influenced Howard to make contact with Lovecraft, and indirectly led to the conceptualization of Cimmeria and Conan the Barbarian. 8)
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:you're taking a broader interpretation of underworld exploration than I intended for this essay.
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:...Tolkien Enterprises cease and desist letter timing seeming to coincide with the delays in the release of the Monster Manual..TSR never really looked back at the less-marketable DIY approach very seriously again..August 31, 1976: Lankhmar (boardgame)..December 1, 1976: Metamorphosis Alpha..January 24, 1978: Gamma World...
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:From various clues (Strategic Review, Dragon, recollections, ads) which are in my Book IV research (1976-1977), I believe they were released as a standalone product in June of 1976. Their widest distribution would be in the 1977 Holmes set. There was an ad in March 1977, which I believe was a response to them not selling well.
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:I think it's the Grognard Games interview with Rob Kuntz where he says that the response from TSR to seeing the first "dungeon module," Vampire Queen, was "Why would anyone want this? Why would you want anyone to do your imagining for you?" ..instead of providing piles of tools to other players.
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:In retrospect, it's miraculous that D&D was designed the way it was and actually took off. The Basic Set with the geomorphs and assortment probably felt like an incomplete board game to many.
darkseraphim wrote in Hawk & Moor: A new D&D book and request for beta readers:I believe the problem was that by 1976, there were DMs with two+ years of experience out there who knew exactly what novice DMs needed in print to help them get up to speed. Meanwhile, TSR was filled with veterans from the Greyhawk campaign, Tim from the Carbondale area group, and the Twin Cities gamers (Carr, Megarry, Arneson, Sutherland) who had all gamed with Gary/Dave or their close associates (Barker, Mornard, etc.). I don't think TSR really had any employees yet who had learned D&D from just the books, as opposed to from the veterans.