darkseraphim wrote:Wow, complete condecension. OK. I think I'll leave it with "Fuck you, piss off" and end the discussion.
Aneoth wrote:With your last response you have just demonstrated your corruption to all who read this thread. Furthermore, you have done so in vivid print, in stunning fashion, and in public.
deimos3428 wrote:Well, this thread sure got stupid while I was sleeping. I'm not going to comment on bids/auctions/whatever, but cursing? Maybe it's because I'm Canadian and we curse all the time (we don't have guns), but I didn't think it was a big deal. Completely off topic, I know, but the topic wasn't exactly pro-active, anyway.
OK, let me get this straight. I just apologized. Not once, but twice on this forum and what is your response?
mdr003 wrote:I read through the thread again, and it might just be me but I can't find any apologies.
Aneoth wrote:"....I have now seen from the above responses, that I should have contacted you before presenting the feedback. So now I am quite sure that I screwed up. I suspected it before, but I was unsure. Now I know it is so....."
mdr003 wrote:...but I think you enlarged your insults to all members of the forum, not just Dark.
Deadlord36 wrote:All right, close this soap opera. All points have been made and read, all opinions voiced. Please don't make this a Frank thread of old, guys.
Shingen wrote:The feedback system is almost slanted to hurt sellers. Most people who only buy have much less feedback, and generally it doesn't hurt them in bidding on general items, because as long as they pay for it, your cool. Furthermore, they can sacrifice a negative that will give them 1 out of 10 bad to leave you a negative for 1 out of 300 bad; then you look like the ass when selling, because they don't care what happens, but you do.