Deadlord36 wrote:Trav, I have several copies of all the supplements if you want to consider a trade. I actually just put up four 1st prints.
dzubak wrote:This is more a laughable pic than an item description.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... eName=WDVWI mean who chooses that environment for a background unless the situation went like this:"Honey, I need you to chop the greens for dinner before my parents get here""I'll be right there, I need to take a picture of my module for an auction that I just listed.""NOW!"Slinks into kitchen, chop, chop, chop, thinks 'oh sh!t I need to get that picture listed', quickly throws module onto counter, snaps picture and runs off to the computer.
bclarkie wrote:Looks like one of our own has succumbed to putting the TSR history in his listings:cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem& ... 7&rd=1
deimos3428 wrote:I'm not sure if this one applies or not. I always thought S1-4 was bound similar to I3-5 or T1-4...am I wrong?cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&a ... 1&rd=1
bclarkie wrote:deimos3428 wrote:I'm not sure if this one applies or not. I always thought S1-4 was bound similar to I3-5 or T1-4...am I wrong?cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&a ... 1&rd=1Actually, for some reason S1-4 is loose from the cover like it appears in the picture, and it was not attached at the spine like the other supermodules are. IMHO regardless, S1-4 is without a doubt the worst of any of the supers by FAR. It was a horrible attempt at putting together 4 totally seperate excellent scenarios that had no real attachement to each other than the fact that they were all located in Greyhawk, listed in the S series and not much else. It was just a mess.
Xaxaxe wrote:And don't forget to read the fine print, wherein the buyer gets the privilege of getting shafted for PayPal's seller fees. Actually, it's "pay pall" according to this genius.This guy, to quote our UK friends, is a total muppet.
SORRY I CAN'T SHIP TO CANADA!!!
bclarkie wrote:I wonder does he have a drug conviction(Bob Probert)?
bclarkie wrote:Sorry, a bit off topic I must admit