huw wrote:Don't know if this should go under "Shady Dealers" or not:
huw wrote:Don't know if this should go under "Shady Dealers" or not:cgi.ebay.co.uk/D-D-AD-D-Silver-Annivers ... dZViewItemA silver box, listed as new with a shrinkwrapped picture - but the (very) small print mentions that the picture is a stock picture, it's been opened and it's missing L3 and some art.
Hoping your buyers don't see the really, really small print is the very definition of "shady." As is any use of a stock photo when the seller's own item clearly differs in condition. You posted this one in the correct thread, for sure.
Sea-to-sky-games wrote:I don't think any seller of any product goes out of his or her way to stress, emphasize, or call undue attention to characteristics of an item that some may find unattractive. Case and point, virtually 100% of the items you purchase have "fine print". Nor do they seek to perfectly educate the buyer about every item they are about to purchase.With that in mind I don't think it's reasonable to hold this seller to some higher standard. The seller correctly notes the missing elements, and frankly you'd have to be pretty stupid, ignorant, or both not to notice it [apparently everyone on this forum was aware of it under their own power]. After all, he's got in big capital letters things that are there.. and anyone who is remotely interested in these things will be sure to want to see L3 listed.. so the absence is pretty glaring.So yes, sellers will take advantage of ignorant buyers.. just as buyers will take full advantage of ignorant sellers.. but that's human nature, and of which everyone here is "guilty" to some degree or another.
Sea-to-sky-games wrote:gyg wrote: ** expired/removed eBay auction **Silver box - but in a teeny-tiny itsy-bitsy note - no L3 etcYou would think "opened, but never used" would exclude a state in which important components were missing.
gyg wrote: ** expired/removed eBay auction **Silver box - but in a teeny-tiny itsy-bitsy note - no L3 etc
Sea-to-sky-games wrote:I don't think any seller of any product goes out of his or her way to stress, emphasize, or call undue attention to characteristics of an item that some may find unattractive.
thehiddenone wrote:further proof that you
Sea-to-sky-games wrote:Case and point, virtually 100% of the items you purchase have "fine print". Nor do they seek to perfectly educate the buyer about every item they are about to purchase.
thehiddenone wrote:further proof that you continuously just talk out of your ass.
jasonw1239 wrote:That reminds me...I have not seen bclarkie posting for about a week or so.Does anybody know if he is ok?
Kingofpain89 wrote:He has posted some over on Dragonsfoot this weekend so I am sure he is fine.
Mars wrote:I emailed the seller and pointed out some of the shady bits about his auction and he has since taken that one down and relisted it with the description fixed.
Sea-to-sky-games wrote:So yes, sellers will take advantage of ignorant buyers.. just as buyers will take full advantage of ignorant sellers.. but that's human nature, and of which everyone here is "guilty" to some degree or another.
evl wrote:To suggest that everyone here is "guilty" of trying to fleece others is insulting.