Blackmoor wrote:After winning the auction (I think is was for $20.00 or so) he sent me an invoice with shipping for over $70.00. I sent him a terse e-mail about the overcharge on shipping and his reply was something like "I didn't get what the item was worth so I charge more for shipping"...
Noble Knight Games wrote:3) We use stock photos wherever possible. This is clearly stated on the webpage and the eBay page. It boggles my mind how many places I can put information and still have it be missed or ignored. EBay is new for us.
Improv wrote:Both our purchases were made back in 2007. I am now sure where the line is between new and experienced but I am pretty sure 5 years is long enough to move out of the new category.
Versimilitude wrote:Hi,particularly as the item as described as VG.In the grading system VG is described as COMPLETE....Cheers,KAL
misterspock wrote:Since when does a "very good" condition include someone having colored in any of the pages, whether it's "neatly" done or otherwise?It doesn't even match their grading system in their own auction details! ** expired/removed eBay auction **and again, here's the Jade Hare -- shown with cover -- yet you have you go down four paragaphs into the description to read the disclaimer that there's no cover.http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dl ... rid=229466
Pipswich wrote:An item is worth what the buyer will pay. If it is not worth the price to you, why fret? Prices fluctuate based upon context.
Pipswich wrote:FYI, I wish I had a local bookstore that handled rpg irregardless of price. (Hint)... if the guys prices are too high, then they simply won't sell and you don't need to be offended... save up some money, be very, very nice and politely let him know you might be willing to buy ALL of the rpg if he ever wants or needs the cash flow.
bbarsh wrote:I have a real simple solution: if you do not have a picture of the actual item, don't post a picture at all. Done.