stormber wrote:They just entered G3 Hall of the Fire Giant King.
darkseraphim wrote:IThe problem with all of that detail is that you can plan a character out from level 1 to 20 (30? 40? The progression is too quick now), with every little perk, class, and ability you want to discover along the way. It's then just a question of railroading the DM into meeting your agenda. My own players (who I miss dearly) were wonderful, and willing to accept DM decisions with grace. We had arguments after the session sometimes that made me a better DM. But the new crop of players, every time I try to start a 3.0 (now 3.5) campaign, I try to put controls on the process to bring out the best qualities of the old game that have been lost..
Shingen wrote:Deadlord's ideas have merit, and I really think they are cool. I was at GenCon for the 3.0 release announcement, and one of the things the designers talked about was the "Sacred Cows," those things you have ot have to be D&D. These included the 6 standard scores, character classes, and the basic races. To preserve continuity and creative lineage with the older versions of the game, they kept these things in.
Deadlord36 wrote:Uhhh, sorry about that. Someone just handed me a Scarab of Insanity.
Shingen wrote:I apoligize if this topic is out of place, but I was a little curious.I have been snoping around here for a few days, and I was wondering what games everyone here plays now, and how long? Do you still play Basic/First/Second Edition? Do your gaming habits affect your collecting habits?I personally play a 3.5 game weekly, but it seems like some people here have some hostility towards the newer edition. I have to kind of balance what I collect against what new stuff I need.