| Author |
Message |
lawrenson
Prolific Collector
Joined: 06 Nov 2002 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 592
Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:51 am |
|
|
| dbartman wrote: |
I believe the damage was caused because it was too tall for the box. |
I think the ones in the boxes normally were trimmed (rather inexpertley) to fit the box, by having their bottom cut off.
Cheers,
Malc |
|
|
|
|
 |
dbartman
Valuation Board
Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Last Visit: 06 Jan 2009
Posts: 680
Location: Ohio, The land without sun
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:41 pm |
|
|
That makes sense. Then this one was probably either not trimmed properly or was not part of this box set originally.
Johnhuck can let us know if he ever visits the forums again. He picked it up for a pretty decent price. |
|
|
|
|
 |
gyg
Valuation Board
Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Last Visit: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 1291
Location: UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:08 pm |
|
|
I saw that John won that - not seen him around for ages. (Am I dreaming or did he sell a load of stuff off at the beginning of this year?)
Hope this means he'll come back here - nice guy John |
|
|
|
|
 |
JasonZavoda
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Last Visit: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 413
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
JasonZavoda
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Last Visit: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 413
|
Posted:
Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bracton
Prolific Collector
Joined: 14 May 2008 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 108
Location: West of a site called "Chicago" . . .
|
Posted:
Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:05 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
ExTSR
Prolific Collector
Joined: 01 May 2004 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 774
Location: The Colonies... (uh, what year is it?)
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:56 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Rakeesh sah Tarna
Prolific Collector
Joined: 04 Dec 2005 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 827
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:27 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
misterspock
Valuation Board
Joined: 25 Sep 2007 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 51
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted:
Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:31 am |
|
|
How many sheets are supposed to be in AC5? 14 sounds like an odd number to have originally come with. I looked up the AC5 info on the miscellaneous page of the site, but it didn't mention the total of number of sheets.
The seller states "All books are in great shape, no tears, missing pages, writing, highlighting or stains.", but I wonder if he's not aware that a bunch were removed. |
|
|
|
|
 |
aia
Verbose Collector
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Last Visit: 03 Jan 2009
Posts: 1210
Location: Italy
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:09 am |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
JasonZavoda
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Jul 2007 Last Visit: 07 Jan 2009
Posts: 413
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:52 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
simonmwh
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Last Visit: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 24, 2008 3:52 pm |
|
|
Totally agree. Soon as there is any hint of water near books its a no go. Staple rust, mould and dodgy stuck together pages just don't do it for me.  |
|
|
|
|
 |
Kingofpain89
Sage Collector
Joined: 31 Oct 2004 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 2556
Location: Plano, Texas
|
Posted:
Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:05 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
johnhuck
Verbose Collector
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Last Visit: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 1034
Location: Leicester, UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:39 pm |
|
|
| lawrenson wrote: |
I think the ones in the boxes normally were trimmed (rather inexpertley) to fit the box, by having their bottom cut off.
Cheers,
Malc |
It looks like it was curled up at the edges from being stored in the box. There are 39/50 sheets remaining. So, I'm fairly happy with the acquisition.
The rulebook doesn't have prices, but the reference on page 11 is to Halflings rather than Hobbits. I now have two sets like this. And they both have the White Dwarf subscription form with the image of #13(Jun/Jul 79) and #14(Aug/Sep 79). But I suppose that there is a very good chance that these forms were slipped into any unsold boxes lying around in the shops rather than at the point of production.
Does anyone have a third UK print that mentions Hobbits? If so, then these presumably sit between the existing 3rd/4th.
http://www.acaeum.com/ddindexes/setpages/foreign/basicfor.html
Unfortunately only a flying visit. But I still occasionaly lurk.  |
|
|
|
|
 |
johnhuck
Verbose Collector
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Last Visit: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 1034
Location: Leicester, UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:42 pm |
|
|
| gyg wrote: | I saw that John won that - not seen him around for ages. (Am I dreaming or did he sell a load of stuff off at the beginning of this year?)
Hope this means he'll come back here - nice guy John |
Thank you very much
Will try and drop by.
I did get rid of some stuff. But there is still more to list when I get round to it.
A word of advice for anyone planning on having kids. They really do take up a lot of time. And I've only got the one! |
|
|
|
|
 |
simonmwh
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Last Visit: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:15 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Kingofpain89
Sage Collector
Joined: 31 Oct 2004 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 2556
Location: Plano, Texas
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:36 pm |
|
|
| simonmwh wrote: | http://cgi.ebay.com/1193-monsterous-manuel-upside-down_W0QQitemZ170265 846794QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item170265846794&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7 C65%3A3%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
Is this right?  |
Turning anyone upside down, regardless if they are named Manuel or not, is wrong. Unless of course they owe you money...then all is fair.
Seriously though....no it isnt right. Zero feedback seller who cant spell very well is just fishing. Interesting aberration but I seriously doubt anyone would offer her any decent money for it.
But I could be completely wrong. I am sure there is someone with a lot of money that would want something like that. |
|
|
|
|
 |
simonmwh
Prolific Collector
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Last Visit: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted:
Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:21 pm |
|
|
Admittedly the price is way off but interesting from a collectors point of view. Shame the bidding didn't start $490 cheaper  |
|
|
|
|
 |
misterspock
Valuation Board
Joined: 25 Sep 2007 Last Visit: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 51
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted:
Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:14 am |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
deimos3428
Sage Collector
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Last Visit: 05 Jan 2009
Posts: 2635
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted:
Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:29 am |
|
|
| simonmwh wrote: | http://cgi.ebay.com/1193-monsterous-manuel-upside-down_W0QQitemZ170265 846794QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item170265846794&_trkparms=39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7 C65%3A3%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
Is this right?  |
He's fallen into the trap of thinking "defective" = "highly valuable". It's a curiosity, but I doubt it adds any significant value to the work. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|